For the first time in 30 years, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has published new guidelines for the Recommended Daily Intake (RDI) and Daily Values (DV) for most vitamins and minerals. These changes, in addition to other updates being made to our food nutrition labels, are forcing manufacturers to make some serious changes to their products. In order to meet the mandatory deadline of January 1st, 2020 for these new labeling guidelines, manufacturers will have to change their formulas or update their packaging in order to comply. While this label overhaul may be a headache for food, beverage, and supplement companies, it’s long overdue and in the best interest of consumers. Imagine if we still subscribed to low fat and high carb eating pattern that was once a popular dieting trend of the 80’s and 90’s. Most likely, many of us would be suffering from some serious sugar-related consequences had we continued to consume those chemical-laden, fat-free foods.
While the clock is ticking for companies to make these mandatory updates, many seem to be waiting for time to run out before taking action. Ironically, vitamin manufacturers, which we would like to believe would be the first to update their products to meet these new nutrient standards, have proven to be just as hesitant to make the changes as many other companies within the food and beverage category. So what are these updates and how will they affect the nutritional content and nutrient density of our foods and supplements? Is there a surefire way to ensure your products are meeting these new requirements? With so many questions swirling around these FDA updates, we thought we’d take the opportunity to break down these revisions to better understand the new recommendations. *We also included a handy image of the FDA Daily Value Changes at the end of this article with all of the nutrients listed in the order they appear on the supplement fact panel (the Increase/Decrease %, Previous Daily Value and the New Daily Value.)
To understand the latest FDA updates to the units used on nutrition labels, it’s best to first understand what’s already printed on our product’s packaging. If you look at the nutrition label of a food or supplement, you’ll notice the Percent Daily Values (%DVs), which notes the percent of the nutrient provided by a single serving of the product in relation to the daily requirement. This allows consumers to judge the nutrient density of the item and adjust their daily intake accordingly. It’s important to also note that the percent daily values for various nutrients might have an upper or a lower limit, meaning that an individual should aim to consume less than the upper limit and at minimum, meet the lower limit value. Up until the latest FDA update, these daily values have been measured using International Units (IU’s) for vitamins A, D, E, niacin, and folate. With the latest labeling changes, these micronutrients will now be measured with new units.
Along with the unit updates, the FDA has adjusted the recommended daily values for many vitamins and minerals. These simultaneous changes present a challenge for consumers, who will now have to convert the outdated units to the new measurements before evaluating if their food or supplement meets the latest standards. Since most companies have not made the required changes to their packaging, this tedious process could become a regular hassle for consumers who are trying to keep up to date with the new dietary guidelines.
The notable increases in FDA recommended daily values include potassium, calcium, vitamin D, vitamin K, and vitamin C, which all saw bumps in their recommended intake levels following FDA research on the micronutrients role in various public health issues.
The FDA has both increased the daily value for potassium and changed its status from a voluntary label to mandatory for all food and supplement packaging. These changes could be attributed, in part, to a rise in sodium consumption based on current diet trends. A diet that is excessively high in sodium but low in potassium can lead to an increased risk for developing cardiovascular disease and high blood pressure.
The FDA has stated that 28 percent of the current population is currently consuming less than the recommended daily intake for vitamin C from either food or supplements. However, while most diets are low in the nutrient, the majority of the population is not deficient. With this in mind, the FDA has changed the status of vitamin C labeling on product packaging to voluntary rather than mandatory.
With 37 percent of the population not currently reaching adequate levels of calcium with their intake, the FDA has adjusted the daily value accordingly. Because the nutrient plays an important role in bone health and preventing serious bone-related conditions like osteoporosis, the FDA’s recommendation for an increase in calcium indicates that these conditions are a major health concern for the general public. But beware, too much calcium can lead to arterial calcification if your body does not store it in the bones, but rather stores it in your blood vessels. The fortification of calcium in many foods may lead to too much calcium being ingested, so mind your diet. Vitamin K2 can help your body direct calcium out of the blood and into the bones.
Like calcium, vitamin D plays an important role in bone health and development. For this reason, the FDA has recognized vitamin D deficiency as a public health concern and has both increased the suggested daily values for the intake of the nutrient and changed the status from voluntary to mandatory as a required nutrient for product nutrition labels.
The daily value established by the FDA for vitamin K is the only nutrient that is established based on an Adequate Intake level versus an Estimated Daily Requirement. The FDA recommendation is based solely on data for vitamin K1, which is found in plant products and does not consider vitamin K2 or K3. While the FDA does not allow for food fortification with K2 or K3 vitamins, supplement products may use these forms of the nutrient.
The suggested increases in these vitamins are important for consumers to consider when choosing products and building a healthy diet. Since these recommended increases are based on 30 years of public health data, any deficiency in these vitamins or minerals could compromise a consumers well-being. Therefore, it is in the best interest of everyone that companies act quickly to make these updates.
Just as with the vitamin and mineral increases, the FDA lowered the daily values for 14 vitamins and minerals based on current public health data. Some of the most significant drops include the recommended daily values for vitamin A, natural vitamin E, zinc, copper, chromium, selenium, and B vitamins. Of these decreases, the percent reduction in the recommended daily value for the B vitamins was the most significant, with a 40 percent decrease in folic acid, a 50 percent reduction in pantothenic acid, a 60 percent reduction in vitamin B12, and a 90 percent reduction in biotin. While these new reduced micronutrient values have been made based on general trends and statistics, it’s important to note how these changes could potentially impact the nutrient density of our products.
In addition to the reduction of the daily value, vitamin A will no longer be required on nutrition labels. The FDA has stated that vitamin A deficiency no longer represents a public health concern. However, some research has linked vitamin A toxicity to certain health complications, including birth defects when overconsumed by pregnant women and an increased risk for developing osteoporosis.
This fat-soluble vitamin has undergone both a unit change and an update to the FDA recommended daily value, which reflects how the nutrient is used in the body. While there are eight variations of vitamin E, the only form that is used and remains in the blood is alpha-tocopherol, which is the type the current daily value is based on. Using evidence obtained over the last 30 year period, the FDA has ruled that vitamin E deficiency is no longer a public health concern and that the previous daily value, which was 25 percent higher than the current DV, was unnecessary for general health.
Zinc and copper are two minerals that work in balance, with one nutrient opposing the bioavailability of the other. Research has shown that a high zinc intake will prevent the absorption of copper, so a careful balance between the two nutrients is necessary for health and well-being. To ensure this careful equation remains in check, the FDA was required to lower the daily values for both nutrients. Based on the FDA’s findings, a deficiency was not a public health concern for either mineral. However, overconsumption of both zinc and copper, particularly concerning blood, liver, and heart health is dangerous for consumers.[6,7]
The FDA’s proposed changes to the daily values assigned to the B vitamins were the most significant out of all of the updates. The FDA found that deficiencies in these vitamins were not a public health issue and that the former DV levels were excessively high and essentially unattainable through diet alone. However, several subpopulations are at a greater risk of having low levels of certain B vitamins. For example, plant-based eaters are more likely to experience a vitamin B12 deficiency, since it is found primarily in animal products. Vitamin B6, which is involved in immune system support, is beneficial for those with a suppressed immune response. Folate or folic acid is necessary in higher doses for pregnant women, as the nutrient helps to prevent birth defects. Finally, most of the B vitamins impact energy metabolism, which is useful for active individuals.
Since the new daily values have been established based on the needs of 50 percent or more of the average population consuming a 2,000 to 2,500 calorie diet, these more specific needs were not considered when making the final recommendation.
In addition to the decreased daily values for the above vitamins and minerals, the FDA also reduced the recommended values for both chromium and selenium. Chromium, which was reduced by 70 percent, and selenium, reduced by 21 percent, appeared to be based on two primary factors. Low levels of either mineral were not an apparent public health concern for the general population. However, adequate intake levels of chromium and selenium have been shown to provide substantial health benefits to those with conditions such as diabetes or who have a suppressed immune system.[10,11]. While there is evidence to suggest the protective effects of both of these nutrients, for the general population the formerly high daily value levels were not necessary. Additionally, the FDA’s updated recommendation for these minerals could be indicative of the low levels of both nutrients in natural food sources, meaning the previous daily values would be nearly impossible to reach through diet alone.
Backed by several decades of research and observation examining the health trends, dietary changes, and other societal shifts that impact the general population, the FDA’s decision to lower the above nutrients comes well informed. With the clock ticking to make the required revisions, companies will need to reformulate their products, adjust their packaging, or both, to meet the new FDA guidelines for these lowered daily values.
The FDA’s update to food labeling and nutrition requirements represents a shift in our eating patterns and a better understanding of our nutritional needs. With changes to the Recommended Daily Intake, the Reference Amount Customarily Consumed (which reflects more accurate serving sizes), the units of measurement, and the Daily Values for many essential vitamins and minerals, consumers will have a lot to consider when choosing their foods and supplements. So what is the best way to ensure you’re nutrition is reflective of these new standards?
Consumers must first be aware of these updates and prepare to spend some extra time scrutinizing nutrition labels. Not only will we have to compare the nutrient values of our foods and supplements to the new recommended values, but in the cases of vitamin D, E, A, niacin, and folic acid, we will have to apply a bit of arithmetic to convert the old units to the new in order to calculate the daily value.
For those of us who like to make informed decisions when it comes to the foods and supplements we consume, this transition period to the new nutrition guidelines will make grocery and supplement shopping a more cumbersome process. One simple way to avoid the nutrition label nuisance is by selecting items that have already implemented the new FDA standards for the packaging of their products.
For example, the MICROGEL™ multivitamin Bioactive Multi by Healthycell has been formulated specifically with the new FDA guidelines in mind to bring consumers a supplement that is as innovative in form as it is in function. Companies like Healthycell that have designed products that adhere to the FDA’s latest nutritional recommendations are proving the value they place on the last 30 years of scientific research that has gone into the FDA nutrient and nutrition label update as well as their customers’ overall wellbeing. So if you’d like to save yourself from having to compare and calculate your supplement’s nutrition based on the FDA changes, your best bet is to go with a product like the Bioactive Mutli by Healthycell.